Tag Archives: water

Climate Change increasing waterborne diseases in the Arctic?

It is the old and the young most at risk from infectious gastrointestinal illnesses in Canadian Inuit populations. Photo Source: Wikimedia Commons.

From India to Canada, today we see the water related challenges another group of people face as a result of changing climate.

A multi disciplinary study published recently in the journal EcoHealth has found that the effect that climate change will have on the hydrological cycle is likely to increase the risk of waterborne disease for the indigenous Inuit in Canada.

This study looked at visits to medical clinics by people with infectious gastrointestinal Illnesses (IGI’s, aka tummy bugs) in two remote Inuit communities in Labrador, Nain and Rigolet. The study was carried out by researchers (epidemiologists, climatologists, and hydrologists), as well as community members, and both local and central Canadian government.

From data gathered by statistics Canada in 2004, 34% of Canadian Inuit reported that there were times during the year when they thought their water was contaminated, with 18% feeling that it was unsafe to drink their tap water. In the community of Rigolet (with a population of 269 people), 100% of resident Inuit felt their drinking water was not safe at certain times of year.

Remote Inuit communities such as this one often have higher negative health indicators than the general Canadian population. Photo Source: Wikimedia Commons.

Why?

Recently, the local weather in the area has been changing, with higher temperatures, more intense and frequent storms, and changes in rainfall pattern.

Heavy rainfall and rapid snowmelt increase water speed (velocity), overland flow, and shallow subsurface flow of water to rivers. This in turn may increase sediment loads in waterways and transport harmful pathogens such as E.Coli.

Many Inuit prefer to drink water from streams and rivers rather than treated from tap, and in some remote regions, it is all they have access to. Canadian Inuit often live subsistence lifestyles, with higher rates of tuberculosis, infant mortality, and shorter life expectancies than other Canadians.

This study found that those who drink untreated brook (stream) water appeared to be at greater risk of exposure to pathogens, than those who did not. Visits to medical clinics for IGI’s were higher in the weeks after heavy rainfall. As heavy rain is predicted to increase with the changing climate, the study suggests that this pattern will be exacerbated.

Those most at risk appeared to be young and elderly women, and it was suggested that this was the case due to higher exposure to pathogens during food preparation.

I found it interesting that in this study, the senior age group was 65+ rather than 75+ as there were so few people older than 75, due to the shorter life expectancy of Inuit people. With so few people over the age of 75, it was impossible to ensure that data gathered in this age bracket could remain anonymous.

The study concluded by suggesting that more needs to be done in terms of treating drinking water to protect public health in the future with the effects of climate change.

Other indigenous communities around the world, such as the Batwa people of Equatorial Africa, also struggle with changes in their environment as climate change progresses.

Indigenous people and climate change

Many indigenous communities are especially vulnerable to climate change as they live closely with, and rely on, the natural environment. This increases the effect on the population of even subtle changes in the climate.

It is rather ironic that this is the case, as indigenous communities often live in sustainable ways, in harmony with the environment. Indigenous populations in general have substantially lower carbon footprints than non-indigenous communities, who are more shielded from climate change because of their distance from the natural environment.

However, non-indigenous people are not immune to these issues. It has been said that indigenous people often act as a ‘crystal ball’ and show what is likely to become a widespread phenomena in the future.

This study was conducted as part of a larger collaboration by the IHACC (Indigenous Health Adaptation to Climate Change), which works with indigenous people around the world, including in the Arctic, Peru and Uganda.

Sources:

Harper, S.L., Edge, V.L., Schuster-Wallace, C.J., Berke, O., McEwen, S.A. (2011) Weather, Water Quality and Infectious Gastrointestinal Illnesses in Two Inuit Communities in Nunatsiavut, Canada: Potential Implications for Climate Change. EcoHealth, Vol. 8 (1), 93-108.

National Geographic.

Advertisements

2 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

The end of the world?

Scenes like this may become more common in the future, as rainfall will increase in some areas. This image is of a flood in Pirna Germany, in August 2002. Photo source: Wikimedia Commons.

No, not the end of the Mayan Calendar, its time to talk about water in the future. To find out what will happen to our water resources under various climate change scenarios, I went to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (the IPCC).

Climate Change and Water, Technical Paper VI was published in 2008, and has gathered together as much relevant scientific knowledge as possible.  Its aim was to create links in knowledge, and inform the policymakers who need to make decisions about freshwater management for the future.

Today I’m going to introduce you to the broad challenges that we face with the current projected climate changes, and explore them in more depth in the coming posts.

The main points…

The warming which already has been observed occurring has been linked with changes in the hydrological cycle. They include:

  • Changes atmospheric water content (as warm air can hold more moisture than cooler air)
  • Precipitation patterns (changing in both time and space)
  • Precipitation extremes (increasing storms etc.)
  • Melting of snow and ice

In the next 100 years extreme precipitation is projected to increase in high latitudes and part of the tropics. Areas which are classified as ‘very dry’ have been increasing, with precipitation likely to decrease in some mid latitude and sub tropical regions.

These changes in global precipitation patterns are very likely to increase instances of both drought and flooding in many areas.

Globally ice and snow stores are expected (with high confidence) to decrease over the next century limiting availability of water in areas that rely on seasonal snowmelt as a source of water. These areas contain approximately 1/6 of the world’s population.

Glacier water storage is likely to decrease as the atmosphere warm. This image is of the glacier Briksdaalsbreen in Norway. Photo source: Wikimedia Commons.

Increased water temperatures are likely to exacerbate many types of water pollution. It will affect suspended sediments, nutrients, carbon, and pathogens. In turn, this will negatively impact ecosystems and human health. This will further reduce fresh, safe water available to us.

Changes to the water system will affect food availability. This is especially the case in dry and marginal areas, and is likely to make already vulnerable people more vulnerable.

The negative impacts of climate change on our global water system are likely to outweigh the positives. Areas which will have positive increases in total water supply (such as a higher rainfall for crops) are likely to be subject to negative processes such as increased variability and seasonal shifts in water supply (eg. all the rain comes at once in a big storm).

On a positive note, the report states that mitigation measures can reduce the impact that climate change will have on our water supplies, if planned and managed sustainably.

And to balance out the flooding, the obligatory cracked earth portrayal of drought. Photo source: Wikimedia Commons.

Where to from here?

While this all sounds pretty dismal, don’t despair! Despite facing huge issues in the future, there are positives. As well as the global push to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions (remember every car ride counts!), there are some pretty interesting smaller scale solutions and mitigation techniques that have been started out there to address these issues.

Tune in next time to hear more.

3 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

When rain becomes a killer…

Acid rain is hugely destructive to stone monuments. Photo source: Wkimedia Commons.

Today, something I didn’t know much about (luckily not a huge problem in little old NZ), but I was interested to learn more.

Read on if you too are curious about acid rain, what it really does, and what can be done about it.

What is acid rain?

Acid rain is a mixture of wet (rain fog and snow) and dry (dust and smoke) materials, which contains above average amounts of nitric and sulfuric acid.

These acids form in the atmosphere when emissions of sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) react with water and oxygen.

What causes acid rain?

 There are natural emitters of the chemicals released, such as rotting vegetation and volcanic eruptions, however most of it can be attributed to anthropogenic (manmade) activities.

The biggest contributor to atmospheric SO2 and NOx is fossil fuel combustion. Countries that produce energy by burning coal (such as China and the U.S) have elevated atmospheric SO2 and NOx. As measures have been taken to decrease this, vehicle emissions are making up a greater percentage of acid rain producing emissions.

What does it do?

Acid rain can kill forest ecosystems, as can be seen in this forest in the Czech Republic.

The most harmful effect of acid rain is its impact on our waterways. Prolonged and persistent acid rain can change the pH of water from a healthy 6-7 to an acidic 5-6.

Acidic runoff releases aluminum from the soil, increasing toxic runoff into waterways, which is harmful to aquatic ecosystems. When pH falls to 5, many fish eggs are unable to hatch, and the population may decline. At a pH lower than 5, adult fish may die.

Acid rain can also be harmful to terrestrial ecosystems. It can damage forests, and the released aluminum in the soil retards water and nutrient uptake by plants. The lack of nutrients can kill leaves, and increases the trees vulnerability to other harmful processes, such as climate extremes.

 It is not only the natural world that acid rain harms. Acid rain can erode paint on cars, and dissolve limestone and marble buildings.

The cost to paint a car using acid resistant paint is $5 higher per car than to paint it using non acid resistant paint. In the U.S this adds up to $61 million per year.

On the bright side, there is no direct adverse effect on humans who are exposed to acid rain.

However, the particles of pollutant in the atmosphere that cause acid rain do have a negative impact peoples lungs, and are related to asthma, bronchitis and emphysema.

There may be a positive side effect of acid rain. Researchers have found that acid rain may reduce the amount of methane (a powerful green house gas) produced by wetlands. This is due to competition between bacteria that live in the wetlands. Acid rain boosts the number of the bacteria which thrive on sulfur, which in turn reduces the number of methane producing bacteria, therefore methane emissions.

Acid rain in China

After withstanding the elements for 1000 years, the Leshan Giant Buddha in China is being slowly destroyed by acid rain. Photo source: Wikimedia Commons.

China is the third largest acid rain region (behind Europe and the U.S), and burns over 3 billion tons of coal per annum.

In 2011 it was reported that 258 Chinese cities experienced acid rain according to official statistics.

The Leshan Giant Buddha, is an ancient statue carved from a cliff, is 1000 years old, and the largest Buddha in the world (standing 71 meters high). Sadly, the Buddha has been badly affected by the acid rain. Its nose is turning black, it hair is eroding, and its reddish body is becoming a charred grey colour.

However, there is hope.

Between 2006 and 2009 Chinas SO2 emissions decreased by 13%, despite construction of new coal fired power plants. This may be explained by the closure if hundreds of old, small inefficient coal fired power plants by the government, and the introduction of a requirement for air filters and monitoring of emissions,

 What can be done?

The best way of limiting the effects of acid rain is by limiting the causes of it. Reducing burning of fossil fuels, using less energy, or finding alternative energy sources are the most effective ways to combat acid rain.

In October 2007, American Electric Power (AEP) settled a lawsuit for failing to take the necessary steps to mitigate the impact of acid rain, brought against it by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Despite denying any wrongdoing, AEP settled the case by promising to spend $1.6 billion to upgrade its coal powered plants.

With continuing legal challenges, public pressure, and sound legislation, such as the EPA’s Acid Rain Program, we can hope there is an end in sight for acid rain.

Furthermore, as coal fired plants and vehicle emissions also contribute to the enhanced greenhouse effect (global warming action on one can only have positive effects on the other, effectively killing two very environmentally destructive birds with one stone.

Sources:

EPA

National Geographic

BBC News

The Indian Express

Yale Environment 360

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

The true cost of our clothing

The Yangtze River. Pollution flows into this river from factories making clothes for the West. Photo source: Wikimedia Commons.

In July 2011, Greenpeace released a report entitled “Dirty Laundry”,  which examined hazardous water chemical wastes discharged from two large factories in China, the Youngor Textile Complex (Yangtze River Delta), and Well Dyeing Factory Limited (Pearl River Delta).

Chemicals found in the water discharged from these factories included both:

  • Alkylphenols (including nonylphenol), which are organic chemicals used in detergents, fuels and lubricants amongst other things. They are banned in the European Union due to their toxicity, persistence and ability to bioaccumulate
  • And, perfluorinated chemicals (PFCs) which are persistent organic pollutants, which do not naturally degrade.

A Chinese problem you think? Well these two companies which I (and I am assuming you too) have never heard of are in fact suppliers to a number of major international brands (which I have heard of). These include:

  • Abercrombie & Fitch
  • Adidas
  • Calvin Klein,
  • Converse
  • H&M,
  • Lacoste
  • Nike
  • Puma

While these companies claim to only use the cutting and sewing faculties at these polluting plants, I would argue that by giving them their business there is a degree of irresponsibility to their actions.

 Researching this post, I discovered the term “Pollution Haven”, a theory that foreign investors are attracted to locating their company in a country with the lowest environmental standards. It seems fairly obvious to me, but I am amazed by the amount of study that has been done on this subject, a quick Google scholar search found me 139, 000 results! It’s a fascinating topic and I urge anyone who is interested in this to look further.

 I acknowledge that this report is not from an unbiased source, Greenpeace are an extreme and vocal environmental organization, and certainly not without their own faults. I am also aware that this is such a large issue, it is impossible to fully discuss in such a short post, however my aim is to introduce this topic, and give you something to think about.

 I do not aim to lambast these particular brands, only to establish a point, which is that these (and other) multibillion dollar companies have the power and ability to insist upon environmental responsibility in their supply chains. I believe that this is what we, as the consumer should demand of them.

 My suggestions? Buy locally made goods, goods produced by companies with good environmental policies, or products made in countries with strict pollution laws. We have a lot of power as consumers, and if companies do not listen to condemnation by environmental groups, they certainly will listen to the sound (or lack thereof) of declining sales.

3 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Ten Fascinating Facts About Water

King of the river... Source: Wikimedia Commons.

Today I had hoped to post on wastewater treatment in Dunedin, however the information available online was rather lacking as to what actually was happening with the $100 million upgrade to the Tahuna Wastewater Treatment Plant. When I called the DCC, a nice man called Guy told me there was no updated information available and to get this I would have to talk to the Wastewater Team who are currently all away enjoying the long weekend!

So I’ll put that on hold till next time, when hopefully I can provide those of you who do not know with the details as to what happens once your water disappears down the plug hole. And as for today? Im going to share with you some fascinating facts I have found about water:

1. Water can dissolve more substances than any other liquid including sulphuric acid.*

2. Plumbosolvency refers to the ability of water to dissolve heavy metals.

3. More than 25% of bottled water comes from a municipal water supply, the same place that tap water comes from.*

4. No substance other than water is naturally found on earth in the three forms: solid, liquid and gas.

5. Because water in the earth comes from a closed system, it is recycled over thousands of years. The water the dinosaurs drank millions of years ago is the same water that comes out of our tap today.

6. The Antarctic Ice sheet is the largest mass of ice on earth. It covers an area of almost 14 million square km and contains 30 million cubic km of ice. **

7. Dihydrogen monoxide is the scientific name for water, check out http://www.dhmo.org/ for a laugh.

8. Half of the world’s wetlands, our natural water filters have been lost since 1900.*** (More on wetlands to come on The Water Watch)

9. Irrigation increases yields of most crops by 100 to 400%, and irrigated agriculture currently contributes to 40 percent of the world’s food production.***

10. And finally, on a slightly different note, I was interested to find out that Hippopotamuses are only territorial in water, where a bull presides over a small stretch of river. **

I hope you learnt something new and interesting today, tune in next time for the rest of the pollution series.

Sources:

*EPA

** Wikipedia

***UN Water Statistics

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

“It’s a dirty bird that fouls it own nest”

Agricultural pollution...Wairarapa New Zealand. Photo source: Wikimedia Commons.

So far I have been looking at the amount of water we use, and hopefully, managed to convey the idea that some things we do use a lot of water in a rather unsustainable way.

Luckily for us, the fresh water system is generally cyclic and renewable. However, there are some practices we as humans do, that have the potential to seriously (and irreversibly) damage the environment, and consequently harm ourselves. Today I’m going to introduce you to the issue of water pollution.

Now, this is a large topic, but arguably the main contributors to fresh water pollution are:

  • Domestic Sewage
  • Industry
  • Agriculture
  • Urban runoff

Domestic Sewage

It has to go somewhere, doesn’t it? While in New Zealand there is legislation in place regarding the treatment of your toilet bowls before it is pumped out to our rivers and oceans, many other countries are not so lucky. The United Nations  tells us the 2 million tons of human waste are disposed into water courses daily. That isn’t treated waste, or dirty water, that’s what comes out of us, and into our rivers and oceans.

Industry

Again, we are lucky to have regulations in New Zealand, but many developing countries do not. Having to treat waste before discharging it is expensive, so there is an attraction for factories to be built in places that are unregulated, therefore decreasing operating costs. Industrial processes often include by products such as PAH’s (more to come on this), oils, ores, acids, particulates (both organic and inorganic), pharmaceuticals, dyes, detergents, plastic, and more! In some places these contaminants flow out of a pipe and straight into the nearest river.

Agriculture

Stock effluent is high in nitrate and ammonium, and this combined with phosphate based fertilizers set up a perfect environment for eutrophication to occur. Eutrophication refers to nutrient enrichment, which typically promotes algal growth, decreases oxygen supply in the water, and damages the ecosystem. Eutophication may kill organisms including phytoplankton and fish, while toxic algae may harm humans and other large mammals (we often hear of dogs dying after they have been in contact with toxic algal blooms).

Urban Runoff

Our urban environment promotes runoff rather than infiltration, as buildings and roads create impervious surfaces requiring storm water drains to remove rain water, rather than natural processes. Heavy rain has the effect of washing away contaminants which have built up on the road surfaces. This typically includes by-products of transportation, such as petrol and oil, as well as heavy metals including copper zinc and lead.

It sounds dreadful, doesn’t it?

But really, we are in no position to vilify these polluters. We must stop and ask ourselves: Whose toilet is it that flushes into the rivers? Who buys the products from those who pump their industrial waste into waterways? Who demands cheaper produce from the supermarket? And finally, whose cars drive around the cities emitting noxious particulate pollutants?

Yes, we must take some responsibility for these issues. But! There is hope. By changing our perceptions, and telling those who make the decisions that we will not support poor environmental practices we do have the chance to put some of these wrongs right.

It is my belief that this is a very significant subject, and to gloss over it would be to do it an injustice. So, for my next few blogs, I aim to discuss each of these pollutant issues, looking at what is going wrong, and most importantly, what we can do about it.  

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

So why blog about water?

These Somalian villagers collect water that has been trucked in by Oxfam. Due to a severe drought, this is their only water supply. Each person get approximatly 7.5 liters per day, well less than the UN's estimate of daily water requirements. Source: Oxfam East Africa.

For us as humans water is vital. The United Nations estimate that a person need at the very least, 20 litres of water per day for drinking, cooking and cleaning. However, 894 million people worldwide (one in six) do not have access to safe, fresh water.

In the developed world this is little more than a sobering statistic, clean, drinkable water pours from a tap. But in third world nations 1.5 million children die per year from illnesses because they either can’t access water at all, or the little they can lacks even the most basic sanitation.

Yet even if we were to provide sanitation to every person in Sub Saharan Africa, we would still be faced with many unresolved issues surrounding water.

To begin with, there is physical scarcity. It may look as if there is water all around, but of the total 1.4 billion km3 of water (both fresh and salty) contained on earth, less than 1% is available for use by humans and freshwater ecosystems. The majority of the unavailable freshwater is trapped as ice and snow, while the difference is made up of groundwater, soil water, and atmospheric water.*

This leaves us 13, 000 km3 of fresh water, spread unevenly across the globe. In New Zealand we are lucky to have a surplus of this precious resource, while our neighbours across the Pacific are often challenged by drought, forcing them to restrict water use, and raising grave concerns for the future.

If we throw the looming threat of climate change into the equation, things become more fraught and uncertain. With summer ice and glacier melt being a huge source of water to millions of people, the loss of alpine glaciers is likely to have a devastating effect.

And the part that I find most frustrating? Despite all these challenges, New Zealand is both economically and geographically blessed when it comes to fresh clean water. Yet this is a stroke of luck we use and abuse.

A study conducted in 2009, which tested rivers across North America, Europe, Australia and New Zealand, found that the Manawatu River (located in the central North Island) was one of the most polluted rivers in the study. The Manawatu is contaminated with treated sewage, industrial waste and agricultural runoff.  This is a sad fact indeed for New Zealand.

With such a range of issues, from poverty to scarcity, climate change to wilful damage, there is a lot for me to discuss about water. But when it really comes down to it, I guess my motivation is the fact that freshwater is a relevant topic for every single person on the planet.

*Statistics from United Nations Water

4 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized